The rapid rise of artificial intelligence has sparked intense debate between those heralding its revolutionary potential and others dismissing it as overhyped, prompting two Princeton scholars to offer a more nuanced perspective in their new book “AI Snake Oil.”
The core argument: Princeton computer science professor Arvind Narayanan and Ph.D. candidate Sayash Kapoor aim to help people distinguish between AI’s genuine capabilities and empty promises.
- Their book “AI Snake Oil” focuses on providing foundational knowledge to separate legitimate AI advances from misleading claims
- The authors argue that while some AI applications show remarkable progress, many marketed AI products make unfounded or impossible claims
- A key example includes AI hiring tools that claim to predict job performance based on brief video interviews, despite lacking scientific evidence
Critical distinctions: The authors emphasize that treating all AI technologies as similar is as problematic as failing to distinguish between bikes, cars, and spaceships.
- Generative AI (like ChatGPT) and predictive AI (used for credit scoring) are fundamentally different technologies requiring separate evaluation
- While generative AI has shown impressive year-over-year improvements, predictive AI still relies largely on decades-old tools
- The authors warn that conflating different AI technologies leads to public confusion and misguided concerns
Real-world impacts: The most consequential AI applications affecting people’s lives today are predictive AI systems making high-stakes decisions.
- These algorithms determine crucial outcomes like bail amounts, hospital stay durations, and hiring decisions
- Insurance coverage may be denied based on AI predictions about recovery time
- The widespread use of similar AI vendors means individuals could face repeated rejections across multiple job applications
Industry influence concerns: The concentration of AI development among major tech companies raises significant issues about the future direction of the technology.
- Large language models can only be developed by the biggest tech labs, giving companies like OpenAI, Google, and Facebook outsized influence
- These same companies are among the biggest spenders on political lobbying
- The centralization of AI development allows industry giants to drive the technical agenda
Positive outlook: Despite concerns, the authors see promising developments in AI’s future.
- They anticipate beneficial AI tools will become seamlessly integrated into knowledge workers’ daily workflows
- Previously “intractable” problems like spellcheck have become routine automated features
- Self-driving technology could potentially help reduce the approximately 1 million annual global auto-related fatalities
Looking ahead: The evolution of AI technology suggests a pattern where controversial cutting-edge applications eventually become normalized, useful tools – much like spellcheck and autocomplete today – while the most concerning current applications may be replaced by more reliable alternatives.
Recent Stories
DOE fusion roadmap targets 2030s commercial deployment as AI drives $9B investment
The Department of Energy has released a new roadmap targeting commercial-scale fusion power deployment by the mid-2030s, though the plan lacks specific funding commitments and relies on scientific breakthroughs that have eluded researchers for decades. The strategy emphasizes public-private partnerships and positions AI as both a research tool and motivation for developing fusion energy to meet data centers' growing electricity demands. The big picture: The DOE's roadmap aims to "deliver the public infrastructure that supports the fusion private sector scale up in the 2030s," but acknowledges it cannot commit to specific funding levels and remains subject to Congressional appropriations. Why...
Oct 17, 2025Tying it all together: Credo’s purple cables power the $4B AI data center boom
Credo, a Silicon Valley semiconductor company specializing in data center cables and chips, has seen its stock price more than double this year to $143.61, following a 245% surge in 2024. The company's signature purple cables, which cost between $300-$500 each, have become essential infrastructure for AI data centers, positioning Credo to capitalize on the trillion-dollar AI infrastructure expansion as hyperscalers like Amazon, Microsoft, and Elon Musk's xAI rapidly build out massive computing facilities. What you should know: Credo's active electrical cables (AECs) are becoming indispensable for connecting the massive GPU clusters required for AI training and inference. The company...
Oct 17, 2025Vatican launches Latin American AI network for human development
The Vatican hosted a two-day conference bringing together 50 global experts to explore how artificial intelligence can advance peace, social justice, and human development. The event launched the Latin American AI Network for Integral Human Development and established principles for ethical AI governance that prioritize human dignity over technological advancement. What you should know: The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, the Vatican's research body for social issues, organized the "Digital Rerum Novarum" conference on October 16-17, combining academic research with practical AI applications. Participants included leading experts from MIT, Microsoft, Columbia University, the UN, and major European institutions. The conference...