Outcome-based pricing strategies are gaining attention in B2B software, but industry veterans caution against viewing this pricing model as a transformative solution.
The current landscape: Outcome-based pricing is emerging as a prominent trend in AI-powered B2B solutions, particularly in customer service and sales automation tools.
- Major vendors like Salesforce, Zendesk, Intercom, and Gorgias are implementing charges of $1-$3 per resolved customer interaction
- Traditional pricing models, such as per-seat licensing for CRM systems and per-transaction fees for payment processors, remain industry standards
- Companies like HubSpot and Salesforce maintain conventional pricing structures for their core CRM offerings
Market realities: Real-world implementation of outcome-based pricing reveals significant practical challenges.
- One SaaStr Fund portfolio company saw a customer with outcome-based pricing exceeding $1 million annually switch to a fixed contract
- Rapidly declining AI operational costs raise questions about the long-term viability of outcome-based pricing models
- Market expectations and established pricing norms continue to influence buying decisions
Strategic considerations: The focus on innovative pricing models may be misplaced when compared to product development priorities.
- Venture capitalists view outcome-based pricing as a way to expand total addressable market (TAM) and increase budgets
- Founders and executives often see it as an opportunity to grow deal sizes
- Industry experience suggests that following established pricing models typically creates the least friction in sales processes
Industry precedents: Existing pricing models in various B2B sectors have evolved based on market acceptance and practical considerations.
- Payment processing companies universally adopt per-transaction pricing because it’s an established industry standard
- CRM vendors typically use per-seat pricing because it aligns with customer expectations and budgeting processes
- Successfully implemented pricing models often reflect industry norms rather than revolutionary approaches
Market adoption reality check: The enthusiasm for outcome-based pricing may outpace its practical applications and long-term sustainability.
- Customers may initially experiment with outcome-based pricing but often revert to traditional fixed contracts for predictability
- The model’s success depends heavily on customer acceptance and willingness to adopt new payment structures
- Product quality and value proposition remain more critical to success than pricing innovation
Looking beyond the hype: While outcome-based pricing presents interesting opportunities in specific AI applications, its broader impact on B2B software pricing may be more limited than current discussions suggest, with successful implementation likely confined to sectors where it aligns naturally with existing business models and customer expectations.
Recent Stories
DOE fusion roadmap targets 2030s commercial deployment as AI drives $9B investment
The Department of Energy has released a new roadmap targeting commercial-scale fusion power deployment by the mid-2030s, though the plan lacks specific funding commitments and relies on scientific breakthroughs that have eluded researchers for decades. The strategy emphasizes public-private partnerships and positions AI as both a research tool and motivation for developing fusion energy to meet data centers' growing electricity demands. The big picture: The DOE's roadmap aims to "deliver the public infrastructure that supports the fusion private sector scale up in the 2030s," but acknowledges it cannot commit to specific funding levels and remains subject to Congressional appropriations. Why...
Oct 17, 2025Tying it all together: Credo’s purple cables power the $4B AI data center boom
Credo, a Silicon Valley semiconductor company specializing in data center cables and chips, has seen its stock price more than double this year to $143.61, following a 245% surge in 2024. The company's signature purple cables, which cost between $300-$500 each, have become essential infrastructure for AI data centers, positioning Credo to capitalize on the trillion-dollar AI infrastructure expansion as hyperscalers like Amazon, Microsoft, and Elon Musk's xAI rapidly build out massive computing facilities. What you should know: Credo's active electrical cables (AECs) are becoming indispensable for connecting the massive GPU clusters required for AI training and inference. The company...
Oct 17, 2025Vatican launches Latin American AI network for human development
The Vatican hosted a two-day conference bringing together 50 global experts to explore how artificial intelligence can advance peace, social justice, and human development. The event launched the Latin American AI Network for Integral Human Development and established principles for ethical AI governance that prioritize human dignity over technological advancement. What you should know: The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, the Vatican's research body for social issues, organized the "Digital Rerum Novarum" conference on October 16-17, combining academic research with practical AI applications. Participants included leading experts from MIT, Microsoft, Columbia University, the UN, and major European institutions. The conference...