The development of artificial intelligence tools within companies has seen significant investment, with AI and machine learning job postings increasing 70-80% in early 2024 compared to 2023. A Stanford research team spent four years studying AI project implementation at a multinational fashion company to understand why some initiatives succeed while others fail. Full paper “Eliciting Domain Expertise in the Absence of Formal Authority:
The Case of AI Developers and Domain Experts in a Large Firm.
Research methodology and context: Stanford researchers conducted an extensive study between October 2019 and December 2023, closely observing software developers’ interactions and project outcomes at a major fashion company.
- The research team followed multiple AI-based projects, ultimately focusing on two contrasting cases that highlighted success and failure factors
- The study revealed three critical variables that significantly influence project outcomes: jurisdictional clarity, task centrality, and task enactment
- Both projects were executed by the same team, eliminating team composition or learning curve as potential variables
Key success factors: The research identified clear patterns distinguishing successful AI implementations from failed ones.
- Successful projects had well-defined groups of stakeholders with clear reporting structures and decision-making authority
- Projects targeting core job responsibilities received better cooperation from domain experts
- Uniform task execution across different locations or teams increased the likelihood of successful AI implementation
Case study comparison: Two specific projects illustrated the stark contrast in outcomes based on these key variables.
- A successful supply chain distribution AI tool benefited from having a small, cohesive group of allocation specialists who shared common goals and processes
- A failed retail productivity optimization project struggled due to diverse stakeholder groups, varying store conditions, and differing management priorities across 200 locations
- The failed project revealed the challenges of developing standardized AI solutions for heterogeneous business environments
Management implications: The research yielded specific recommendations for improving AI project success rates.
- Executive leadership must formally mandate AI initiatives and establish clear guidelines for cooperation between developers and domain experts
- Companies should consider creating liaison positions to facilitate communication between AI developers and business units
- Project scope should be carefully managed, with struggling initiatives being scaled down or refocused on specific problem areas
Developer considerations: The study revealed important insights for AI developers approaching new projects.
- Developers should assess jurisdictional clarity and task centrality before committing to project scope
- Success requires understanding both technical requirements and organizational sociology
- Early evaluation of task homogeneity across different locations or teams can help predict project viability
Looking ahead: While AI development teams often receive substantial resources and autonomy, the research suggests that successful implementation depends more on organizational structure and stakeholder alignment than technical capabilities alone. Future corporate AI initiatives may benefit from more targeted, smaller-scale approaches that consider these organizational dynamics from the outset.
Recent Stories
DOE fusion roadmap targets 2030s commercial deployment as AI drives $9B investment
The Department of Energy has released a new roadmap targeting commercial-scale fusion power deployment by the mid-2030s, though the plan lacks specific funding commitments and relies on scientific breakthroughs that have eluded researchers for decades. The strategy emphasizes public-private partnerships and positions AI as both a research tool and motivation for developing fusion energy to meet data centers' growing electricity demands. The big picture: The DOE's roadmap aims to "deliver the public infrastructure that supports the fusion private sector scale up in the 2030s," but acknowledges it cannot commit to specific funding levels and remains subject to Congressional appropriations. Why...
Oct 17, 2025Tying it all together: Credo’s purple cables power the $4B AI data center boom
Credo, a Silicon Valley semiconductor company specializing in data center cables and chips, has seen its stock price more than double this year to $143.61, following a 245% surge in 2024. The company's signature purple cables, which cost between $300-$500 each, have become essential infrastructure for AI data centers, positioning Credo to capitalize on the trillion-dollar AI infrastructure expansion as hyperscalers like Amazon, Microsoft, and Elon Musk's xAI rapidly build out massive computing facilities. What you should know: Credo's active electrical cables (AECs) are becoming indispensable for connecting the massive GPU clusters required for AI training and inference. The company...
Oct 17, 2025Vatican launches Latin American AI network for human development
The Vatican hosted a two-day conference bringing together 50 global experts to explore how artificial intelligence can advance peace, social justice, and human development. The event launched the Latin American AI Network for Integral Human Development and established principles for ethical AI governance that prioritize human dignity over technological advancement. What you should know: The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, the Vatican's research body for social issues, organized the "Digital Rerum Novarum" conference on October 16-17, combining academic research with practical AI applications. Participants included leading experts from MIT, Microsoft, Columbia University, the UN, and major European institutions. The conference...