×
AI regulation strategies Latin American policymakers should adopt
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

Latin America stands at a pivotal crossroads for AI regulation, where thoughtfully designed frameworks could simultaneously protect citizens and catalyze economic development. The Brookings Institution highlights how regulation serves not merely as a safeguard but as a strategic asset that can attract investment, foster innovation, and strengthen a region’s position in global tech governance. As AI rapidly transforms industries across the Global South, Latin American policymakers have a unique opportunity to develop regulatory approaches that address their specific socioeconomic contexts while establishing the region as a leader in inclusive AI governance.

The big picture: AI regulation has evolved through three progressive stages—from voluntary ethical guidelines to formal national legislation and finally to coordinated regional governance frameworks.

  • Countries with clear regulatory environments, such as the UK in fintech and cybersecurity, typically attract more investment and innovation rather than stifling development.
  • Regulation represents a geopolitical opportunity for nations to influence global standards and strengthen their position in international technology diplomacy.

Key considerations: Latin American policymakers must address three distinct dimensions when crafting AI regulation frameworks.

  • Market dynamics require support for SMEs, reduced compliance burdens, and fostering open-source ecosystems to prevent monopolization.
  • Socioeconomic inclusivity demands AI systems designed for local realities, incorporation of alternative data sources, and safeguards against algorithmic discrimination.
  • Regional collaboration necessitates shared data standards, interoperable governance protocols, and the establishment of a coordinated AI governance network.

Strategic priorities: The report outlines five key focus areas for effective AI regulation in Latin America.

  • Enabling innovation through regulatory sandboxes allows for controlled experimentation with new AI applications.
  • Promoting inclusion via AI literacy programs ensures technologies benefit broader populations.
  • Institutionalizing safety through dedicated oversight mechanisms addresses emerging risks.
  • Preventing market monopolization protects competitive markets and innovation ecosystems.
  • Advancing regional regulatory harmonization creates consistent standards across borders.

Why this matters: Latin America has the opportunity to pioneer development-focused AI governance that could serve as a model for the Global South.

  • Smart regulation can help bridge digital divides rather than exacerbating them, ensuring AI benefits reach beyond urban centers and wealthy populations.
  • By developing inclusive frameworks that accommodate cultural and linguistic diversity, the region can ensure AI systems reflect local needs rather than importing models designed for different contexts.

Reading between the lines: The emphasis on regional collaboration suggests Latin American countries may achieve greater influence by presenting a unified regulatory approach rather than fragmented national policies.

  • This collective approach could strengthen the region’s voice in global AI governance discussions currently dominated by the US, China, and Europe.
  • Coordinated policies would likely attract more investment by creating a larger, more coherent market for AI development.
Smart AI regulation strategies for Latin American policymakers

Recent News

Grok stands alone as X restricts AI training on posts in new policy update

X explicitly bans third-party AI companies from using tweets for model training while still preserving access for its own Grok AI.

Coming out of the dark: Shadow AI usage surges in enterprise IT

IT leaders report 90% concern over unauthorized AI tools, with most organizations already suffering negative consequences including data leaks and financial losses.

Anthropic CEO opposes 10-year AI regulation ban in NYT op-ed

As AI capabilities rapidly accelerate, Anthropic's chief executive argues for targeted federal transparency standards rather than blocking state-level regulation for a decade.