Miguel Guhlin linked to this 2019 article today. It’s the most clearly written on the debate between phonics and alternative methods of learning to read that I’ve seen. Phonics is contrasted with ‘three cuing’, proposed in 1967 by education professor Ken Goodman, where students are focused on what the word means, not what it sounds like. My take on reading this is that phonics really works when we already know the spoken language or are in a situation where we can practice it a lot. We already know the meaning, so associating a word with a sound is a quick route to comprehension. When learning a second language, however, we don’t have this advantage, and we don’t want to spend five or six years fully immersed in the spoken language before learning to read it. So there is much more emphasis on meaning. And no matter how you learn, to have advanced comprehension you’re going to need much more than phonics.
Web: [Direct Link] [This Post]
Recent Stories
AI agents can talk — orchestration is what makes them work together
Orchestration across multi-agent systems and platforms is a critical concern — and a key differentiator for IT leaders hoping to see significant velocity gains with AI agents.
Jan 14, 2026TSMC Can’t Make AI Chips Fast Enough
Last November, during one of Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang’s five visits to Taiwan last year, he and CC Wei, CEO of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., met with reporters. Wei told the assembled media that Huang had come to ask for more chips, to which Huang, standing next to him, replied: “Yes!” ...
Jan 14, 2026‘AI Native’ Startups Double Annualized Revenue to $30 Billion in Seven Months
The revenue picture for AI startups is brightening, a bit. In just seven months, annualized revenue at “AI native” companies selling AI models or apps has doubled,from $15 billionto more than $30 billion, according to an analysis of 32 companies fromThe Information’s Generative AI Database.One ...