×
AI art sparks backlash from Jersey’s creative community
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

Jersey artists are raising concerns about AI-generated images threatening the creative industry as the technology becomes increasingly normalized. This conflict between traditional artists and AI platforms highlights growing tensions in the creative sector, where artists fear losing work to automated systems that have been trained on human-created content without proper attribution or compensation. The issue points to broader questions about copyright protection, creative authenticity, and the future sustainability of artistic careers in the age of artificial intelligence.

The big picture: Jersey artist Abi Overland has publicly expressed frustration over AI-generated images and their impact on the island’s creative community.

  • She describes witnessing the proliferation of AI-created content on social media as “heartbreaking” and warns about potential infringements on artists’ copyright.
  • The controversy emerges as the UK’s House of Lords recently defeated the government on its Data Bill, demanding stronger protections for artists and musicians against AI systems.

Why this matters: Artists argue that AI systems are trained on human-created work without proper attribution or compensation, threatening their livelihoods and professional opportunities.

  • Overland emphasized the human connection in art, stating: “This is our livelihoods, this is our joy so why would we want to take away the human connection of art to save some money.”
  • Illustrator Jamie Willow noted that artists have “spent years harnessing” their skills, and their work “translates ideas into images with heart.”

The other side: Digital Jersey’s head of innovation Sebastian Lawson suggests artists could integrate AI into their creative process rather than viewing it as purely competitive.

  • Lawson believes trained artists can still create superior images because of their “creative insight” even as the technology advances.
  • The UK government claims to be seeking balance, stating it wants both creative industries and AI companies to “flourish” and is “consulting on a package of measures” to benefit both sectors.

What’s next: The UK government has indicated no changes to copyright laws will be considered unless they are “completely satisfied they work for creators,” suggesting ongoing negotiations between creative and technology sectors.

Jersey artist's 'heartbreak' over AI-generated images

Recent News

Large Language Poor Role Model: Lawyer dismissed for using ChatGPT’s false citations

A recent law graduate faces career consequences after submitting ChatGPT-generated fictional legal precedents, highlighting professional risks in AI adoption without proper verification.

Meta taps atomic energy for AI in Big Tech nuclear trend

Tech companies are turning to nuclear power plants as reliable carbon-free energy sources to meet the enormous electricity demands of their AI operations.

AI applications weirdly missing from today’s tech landscape

Despite AI's rapid advancement, developers have largely defaulted to chatbot interfaces, overlooking opportunities for semantic search, real-time fact checking, and AI-assisted debate tools that could transform how we interact with information.