×
Lawyers risk dismissal over AI-fabricated cases, scandalized firm warns
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

The discovery of AI-generated fake legal citations has sent shockwaves through the legal community, particularly after a Morgan & Morgan attorney cited non-existent cases in a Walmart lawsuit. Law firms are now grappling with how to safely integrate AI tools while preventing hallucinated content from contaminating legal proceedings.

The incident at hand: One of Morgan & Morgan’s attorneys, Rudwin Ayala, included eight fabricated case citations generated by ChatGPT in court documents filed against Walmart.

  • The firm swiftly removed Ayala from the case, replacing him with supervisor T. Michael Morgan
  • Morgan & Morgan agreed to cover Walmart’s fees and expenses related to the erroneous filing
  • The firm maintains that no other employees were aware of the AI-generated content

Broader industry context: The legal sector has witnessed multiple instances of AI hallucinations infiltrating court documents over the past two years.

  • Reuters has identified at least seven cases where lawyers inappropriately cited AI-generated fake cases
  • Several attorneys have faced sanctions for submitting artificially created citations
  • T. Michael Morgan described the potential incorporation of fake cases into common law as a “nauseatingly frightening thought”

Preventive measures: Morgan & Morgan has implemented new safeguards to prevent future AI-related mishaps.

  • The firm introduced mandatory acknowledgment of AI hallucination risks before attorneys can access their AI platform
  • Enhanced training programs are being developed to improve AI literacy among legal staff
  • Clear warnings have been issued that failing to verify AI outputs could result in sanctions, disciplinary action, or termination

Evolving professional standards: The legal industry is adapting its practices to address the challenges posed by AI integration.

  • Legal experts emphasize the importance of AI literacy for attorneys
  • Law firms must balance the efficiency benefits of AI tools with the need for thorough verification
  • Professionals must develop a deep understanding of both AI capabilities and limitations

Looking ahead – Navigating the AI frontier: The Morgan & Morgan incident serves as a crucial wake-up call for the legal profession, highlighting the urgent need to develop robust protocols for AI use in legal practice while maintaining the integrity of the justice system. The challenge lies not in avoiding AI altogether, but in creating effective guardrails that prevent AI hallucinations from compromising legal proceedings.

AI making up cases can get lawyers fired, scandalized law firm warns

Recent News

We’re Jammin: 1,000 scientists join Anthropic’s AI Jam at U.S. National Labs

Leading scientists from across the U.S. National Laboratory system will evaluate Claude 3.7 Sonnet on real-world research problems to assess AI's potential to accelerate scientific breakthroughs.

AI-powered police tech evades facial recognition by tracking other physical features

Police departments nationwide deploy AI that identifies people by clothing and body shape, evading legal limits on facial recognition technology.

AI-derived “ReactSeq” language bridges chemistry and machine learning

A new chemical reaction language enables AI to better understand and predict molecular transformations by breaking processes into explicit steps instead of simple input-output patterns.